Collection of Organic Wastes From High-Rise Buildings and Apartment Complexes

garbage-disposal-high-rise

Editor’s note: A digital version of this article first appeared on Forester Network’s website in February 2013.

This article provides highlights from a research memorandum recently published by the SWANA Applied Research Foundation (ARF) on the collection of organic wastes from high-rise buildings and apartment complexes.

This research need was identified by North Vancouver, British Columbia, and selected for investigation during FY2012 (July 2011 through June 2012). The research memorandum presents the results of background research conducted with input and support provided by the ARF’s Recycling and Collection Group Subscribers. (The SWANA Applied Research Foundation was founded in 2001 with the purpose of conducting collectively defined and funded applied research on pressing solid waste issues. It is funded by local governments and other organizations that contribute a “penny per ton” of waste managed to the Foundation on an annual basis. For more information on the SWANA Applied Research Foundation, please contact Jeremy O’Brien, director of applied research, SWANA, 301-585-2898.)

Background
High-rise buildings typically have a large number of floors, which have built-in vertical trash chutes with openings on each floor. Residents dump their waste into a chute on their floor, where it falls into a container at the bottom The chute containers are then periodically taken to the load-out dock where they are emptied into the building’s trash compactor, which compacts the waste and pushes it into a large (typically, 20 cubic yards) roll-off container. To empty the container, a rolloff truck is driven to the building where the container is pulled onto the truck (via a cable or chain mechanism), taken to the disposal site for emptying, and then returned to the building.

Apartment complexes with more than six units generally consist of a number of multistory buildings with ground-level parking areas on the site. Each complex typically has a sectioned-off portion of the parking area, which has one or more collection dumpsters in which residents can place their refuse, recyclables, and organic wastes. These dumpster containers are then serviced on a scheduled basis by front-end loading collection vehicles.

 

The provision of effective organic waste collection services to high-rise buildings has proved to be problematic in most communities for a number of reasons:

  • Limited space for collection containers-High-rise buildings typically have limited space within the building to provide containers, which the residents can use to drop off their source-separated organics.
  • Limited space for building containers-The biggest challenge with adding a separate collection container and service for organics in high-rise buildings is the limited space in the load-out area. Typically, this area is designed to accommodate a single rolloff compactor container.
  • Resident-High-rise residents are accustomed to the convenience of using the trash chute opening on their floor to dispose of their wastes. Source-separated organics recycling requires them to not only keep their waste in a separate container within their apartment but also to physically transport it down through the building to the area (generally the trash chute room) where the organics containers are located.
  • Building custodial staff workload-Adding extra containers for organics collection requires additional work by the custodial staff, who must regularly move the containers to a location where they can be serviced by a collection vehicle and then return them to the collection location within the building. They must also regularly clean the containers and the container location as well as mitigate any odor or vector issues caused by the program.
  • Unpleasantness factor-This is sometimes referred to as the “ick” factor. Keeping certain types of food and organic wastes separate from other wastes can be unpleasant and can create odor and fly problems, especially if the resident is not allowed to use plastic bags to contain the organic wastes.
  • Costs-The provision of another regular collection service to the high-rise building is likely to increase the building owner’s waste management costs.

Unlike high-rise buildings, apartment complexes usually have space on their property to place an additional dumpster for organic wastes. However, they face the same issues of inconvenience and unpleasantness when asking residents to recycle source-separated organics. The apartment complex owners may also incur higher waste management costs due to the additional collection service.

To address these concerns, a number of local governments have tested and/or implemented new approaches to the collection and diversion of organic wastes from high-rise buildings and apartment complexes. Two of the more innovative programs are described below.

Toronto, Ontario
In 2009, the Toronto City Council approved a solid waste plan to reach 70% waste diversion from landfill disposal by 2012. As a result, a number of new waste diversion initiatives were launched including the Green Bin Program and the provision of in-unit recycling containers to multi-residential dwelling units. (City of Toronto Solid Waste Management Services. Green Bin Program and Waste Diversion Strategies for Multi-Unit Residential Dwellings. PowerPoint Presentation.)

Toronto’s Green Bin organics program is the largest organic waste diversion program in North America. The Green Bin program currently serves 510,000 single-family homes and 120,000 multi-residential units. In FY2011, the program diverted 110,663 tons of foodwaste, wet-paper waste, diapers, and pet waste from landfill disposal. (http://www.toronto.ca/greenbin/facts.htm.)

The recovered organics are processed at the city’s Dufferin Organics Processing Facility. This facility utilizes a “wet” anaerobic digestion process. In this process, the organics are fed into a hydropulper and contaminants (such as plastics bags) are removed from the resulting slurry. As a result, residents are allowed to use plastic bags to contain and recycle their organics.

The digested organics produce 609 kWh of electricity per ton of waste digested. In comparison, a typical waste-to-energy facility generates 550 kWh per ton of waste combusted.

The organics and recyclables collection services are provided by the city free of charge to single-family and multifamily residences. The compost produced from the Green Bin program is given away free to residents.

The city conducted an organics collection pilot in 30 multi-unit buildings across the city to determine the best way to bring an organics collection program to the 5,000 apartment, condominium, and co-op building owners. The participating buildings were successful in diverting organic materials from the waste stream and the city is now bringing the program to buildings across the city.

Based on what was learned from the pilot programs, the city designed its program to maximize convenience for multifamily residents. The program allows residents to use plastic bags to contain organic wastes. In addition, it accepts hard-to-process materials such as diapers. (The reason that the Toronto SSO program can accept plastics is that its SSO are processed in a “wet” anaerobic digestion process. In this process the organics are fed into a hydropulper and the plastics are removed from the resulting slurry.) By accepting all types of organics (including diapers, personal hygiene products, and pet wastes), the City could reduce the frequency of waste collection to an every-other-week basis while organic waste collection services are provided on a weekly basis.

The Green Bin Program allows participants to put organics (fruit and vegetables scraps, paper towels, coffee grinds, etc.) out for separate collection along with garbage and recycling.

The city estimates that organic materials make up approximately 30% of the garbage that multi-family residences generate. By separating organics (such as foodwaste and soiled paper food packaging), multifamily building owners can reduce their volume-based garbage fees since they are not charged for organics collection or recycling collection.

Multifamily building owners are required to purchase outdoor organic collection containers. The city provides the building owner with container specifications that can be accommodated by its collection vehicles and crews.

Organic waste containers are serviced by the city on a weekly basis. The city recommends that building owners utilize a container size equivalent to 8 cubic yards for every 1,000 units in their buildings.

 

The city provides each building with a supply of indoor in-unit organics containers (“kitchen catchers”) for residents to collect their organics (one container per unit), along with resident information packages. Each building is entitled to receive up to 10% of the buildings total number of units for replacement each calendar year.

Residents can use the kitchen catchers to take their organics to the centrally located bins in their buildings. Based on the results of the pilot program, residents are allowed to line their kitchen catchers with plastic bags. They then take their bagged organic materials to the common drop-off area and place them in the organic collection bins. The plastic bags are removed from the organic materials at the organics processing facility. The city estimates that multifamily residents generate an average of 165 pounds per residential unit per year of organic wastes. (Van Opstal, B. City of Toronto Case Study in the Anaerobic Digestion of Source-Separated Organic Material. [Presentation made to the California Organics Recycling Council, November 17, 2009].)

The multifamily green bin program is mandatory. As a result, any building owner who chooses not to participate is removed from all city-sponsored waste collection services.

The original focus of the Green Bin Program has been on buildings serviced by front-end loading collection vehicles. Such buildings utilize dumpster containers-as opposed to rolloff containers-for wastes, recyclables and organics collection.

By the end of 2011, 650 buildings representing 120,000 single units have implemented the program.

The following observations are offered with respect to Toronto’s approach to the collection of organic wastes from high-rise buildings and apartment complexes:

  • The Green Bin program targets multifamily buildings that utilize dumpster containers for waste disposal. In these buildings, residents are accustomed to taking their waste out to the collection dumpster.
  • The city’s pilot program work resulted in the decision to allow multifamily residents to use plastic bags to contain their organic waste, which has lowered the unpleasantness associated with participation in organics recycling. As a result, the approach appears to be popular and successful, having been implemented in 650 buildings containing 120,000 households.
  • The allowance of residents to use plastic bags is due to the fact that the collected organics are processed in a “wet” anaerobic digestion facility where the plastic bags are broken open in the hydropulper and later screened out.
  • The inclusion of organic wastes such as pet wastes and diapers in the program has allowed the City to reduce the frequency of waste collection to an every-other-week basis.

San Jose, California
The city of San Jose has been a leader in the field of recycling materials from solid waste for over 20 years and was one of the first municipalities in the United States to develop a Zero Waste Plan. CalRecycle reported a 74% waste diversion rate for the city for 2010. (City of San José Environmental Services Department. Integrated Waste Management Zero Waste Strategic Plan. November 2008. http://www.sanjoseca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1020.)

Despite this success, the city found that multifamily recycling and waste programs were difficult to implement for a number of reasons. It has found that effective outreach to this population has been challenging since apartment dwellers are a more transient population with diverse language requirements. In addition, multifamily buildings often suffer from the “tragedy of the commons” problem, where no one takes responsibility for shared trash and recycling areas. By 2003, the city’s multifamily collection contractor achieved a diversion rate of only 18%. (Ibid.)

Beginning on July 1, 2012, the state of California’s Mandatory Commercial Recycling Law (AB 341) requires all multifamily residential dwellings of five or more units to implement recycling program for their tenants.

As described below, the city has adopted a unique approach to enable multifamily buildings to automatically comply with AB 341 as well as to significantly increase the diversion rate from the multifamily wastestream. This approach involves the encouragement of source-separated recycling at apartment complexes but also provides for the processing of the mixed waste stream to divert additional recyclable and compostable materials.

For high-rise building owners, it appears that they can utilize the “wet/dry” collection service initiated by Republic Services Inc., for business owners in the city this past July.

Each of these programs is described below.

Apartment Complexes
In July 2008, the City of San Jose modified its diversion program for multifamily complexes. Instead of sending most multifamily garbage directly to the landfill, the city’s contractor, GreenTeam of San Jose, now delivers all the solid waste generated by its multifamily residences to a new solid waste processing facility in San Jose.

Located in the city of San Jose, this 96,000-square foot facility-which is called The GreenWaste MRF-processes and recycles residential and commercial trash, yard trimmings, curbside recyclables, foodwaste, and construction and demolition debris. (http://greenwaste.com/about-us/material-recovery-facility-mrf.)

The facility, which is operated by GreenWaste Recovery, removes recyclables such as cans, bottles, and clean paper as well as large non-processable items. Remaining materials, consisting largely of organics, are composted at the Z-Best Composting Facility in Gilroy, California.

In 2008, GreenWaste completed a massive construction and repermitting effort to install two side-by-side processing lines and accept up to 2,000 tons per day of material at the MRF. As a result, the facility has the capability to recover organics and recyclables from mixed wastestreams from multifamily residences and businesses.

 

Since it began operations, the facility has consistently demonstrated recovery rates of more than 98% for recyclable materials and 75% of MSW from the mixed wastestreams from these generators.

The GreenWaste MRF is the first facility in the nation to install two side-by-side processing lines to sort both MSW and single-stream curbside recycling under the same roof. This arrangement takes advantage of both the unique and similar aspects of the two wastestreams, merging clean product from both lines to maximize efficiency and increase the quantity and quality of materials recovered.

The side-by-side design results in economies of scale and allows the facility to take a more comprehensive and cost-effective approach to process both mixed waste and single-stream recycling streams. The mechanical sorting mechanisms and processes include conveyors, sorting stations, screens, separators, magnets, optical sorters, bag breaker, and an eddy-current separator. Processing at the facility begins manually, becomes mechanical, and then goes back to a manual process for final quality control. The result is unparalleled diversion and consistently cleaner product.

The San Jose multifamily waste recycling program is helping the city achieve its zero waste goal without the extra challenge of trying to enforce new recycling requirements for residents, property managers, and owners. The program is, in fact, invisible to property owners and residents and defers more stringent recycling “mandates” on property owners such as those being implemented in San Francisco and San Diego.

Traditional (i.e., source-separated) recycling is still encouraged at multifamily properties. Apartment complexes typically have two dumpsters-one for waste and another for mixed recyclables. Residents are encourage to keep their recyclables separate from their waste and place them in the recycling bin.

The city is in the process of monitoring the effectiveness of the new multifamily program and its achievement of 70% to 75% diversion.

High-Rise Buildings
High-rise building owners in San Jose will be able to comply with AB 341 by participating in the city’s new commercial waste and recyclables collection and processing system. This system, which went into effect on July 1, 2012, is designed to significantly increase the commercial waste diversion rates as well as enable all businesses in San Jose to comply with the AB 341 requirements.

The commercial waste and recyclables collection and processing system is being implemented by Republic Services, Inc. (Republic) and Zero Waste Energy Development (ZWED). In conjunction with implementing this system, Republic was awarded a 15-year exclusive franchise contract to provide collection services to all businesses located within the city limits.

The new system (which was designed based on input received from 500 small and large businesses) requires that business owners separate their solid wastes into two streams: (1) wet and (2) dry.

The wet stream includes these:

  • Foodwaste (fruits and vegetables; bread and pastas; dairy products; meat and seafood)
  • Coffee grounds and filters
  • Food-soiled paper/cardboard (napkins and paper towels; paper cups and plates; paper take-out food containers)

The dry stream includes all other wastes and recyclables. The following list of items is provided by Republic as being included in the dry stream:

  • Clean cardboard and paper
  • Glass bottles and jars
  • Packing materials
  • Carpet and padding
  • Reusable items
  • Plastics
  • Clean wood
  • Scrap metal
  • Foam cups and containers

Each business is provided with either rollout bins (32, 64, or 96 gallons in size) or Dumpster containers. Typically, two bins/containers are provided to each business. When using two bins, businesses are encouraged not to bag either the wet or dry materials. Businesses that produce large amounts of a single item (e.g., cardboard) are provided with a third container. Alternatively, businesses with space limitations can use one container by placing their “wet” materials in clear plastic bags along with the dry recyclables and wastes. The bags are required to be clear in order that sorters at the waste processing facility can identify the bag contents.

Both the wet and dry streams are collected by natural-gas-fueled collection vehicles and transported to the Newby Island Resource Recovery Park. The “Recyclery” at Newby Island is designed to process 400,000 tons per year of wet and dry streams and consists of four process lines:

  • Residential single stream recyclables
  • Commercial single stream
  • Commercial dry recyclables
  • Commercial wet recyclables

The recovery rate is expected to exceed 80% on the commercial lines and 95% on the residential recyclables line.

The organics recovered at the Recyclery are processed using an European dry anaerobic digestion processing technology (Kompoferm). The digestate from this process will be composted in an enclosed composting system provided by IVC Plus. Together, these integrated processes are expected to produce renewable energy (in the form of biogas) and high-quality compost.

As mentioned above, Republic allows commercial waste generators with space limitations to combine their wet and dry streams into a single container. This approach appears to be well suited for multifamily residents living in high-rise buildings. The residents could simply bag their “wet waste” in clear plastic bags and continue to use the vertical waste chute for conveying their wet and dry streams to the collection container under the chute. The custodian would then empty the container into the roll-off compactor at the loading dock.

As the new system was placed into service this past summer, it is not clear whether any high-rise building owners have implemented the wet/dry collection approach.

The following observations are offered with respect to San Jose’s approach to the collection of organic wastes from apartment complexes:

  • The city recognized that participation by the apartment building residents in the source-separated recycling program was low, with diversion rates amounting to 18% of the wastestream. For this reason, the city decided not to pursue a source-separated approach for organics diversion but instead process the mixed wastestream from apartment buildings for organics recovery.
  • This organics collection approach is referred to be “invisible” to the resident and property owner. The placement of a separate organics dumpster at each complex is not required nor is a separate collection service needed. The downside, however, is the production of a lower-quality compost due to the contamination of the organics from other components in the mixed wastestream.

For high-rise buildings, the city’s new “wet/dry” system for the collection of organics and recyclables from businesses appears to offer a promising alternative for high-rise building residents. These residents could be instructed to place their “wet” stream components in plastic bags but keep their “dry” stream components loose whereas they could then place both the wet and dry stream materials in the building’s trash chute. The mixed wet stream bags and dry stream materials could then be processed in the city’s new Recyclery. This approach would solve the inconvenience, unpleasantness, and building space issues associated with organics recycling from high-rise buildings.

Conclusions
The following conclusions are offered with respect to the collection of organics from high-rise buildings and from apartment complexes:

  • The collection of source-separated organics from high-rise buildings has been problematic and ineffective primarily due to the inconvenience and unpleasantness associated with program participation.
  • One option that offers promise is the utilization of a wet/dry collection approach with residents instructed to bag their wet stream components. This approach requires that the materials processing facility be designed to remove and separately process the bagged wet stream components.
  • Another approach is simply to collect the mixed wastes generated by high-rise building and apartment complex residents and process the waste for recyclables and organics recovery in a mixed waste processing facility. While the quality of the recovered organics and therefore the resulting compost product is lower, this approach still results in the diversion of organic waste from these buildings from landfill disposal.
  • The effectiveness of implementing a source-separated organics collection program at apartment complexes appears to be based on whether or not residents are allowed to use plastic bags to contain their organic wastes. If so, participation and diversion rates can be significant. As with the wet/dry approach, the processing facility must be able to process bagged organics.
  • The inclusion of all organic waste in a weekly source-separated organics collection service (including pet wastes, diapers, and personal hygiene products) can enable a local government to reduce the frequency of mixed waste collection to every other week. However, the local processing facility must be able to process the mixed organics and the quality of the compost product may be reduced.
  • The development of effective collection programs for organic wastes underscores the need for local governments to work together to ensure that processing systems (generally implemented by county governments) can process the recyclable and organic streams collected by municipal and private collection service providers. MSW_bug_web
Comments
  • Good passage of stating difficulties of collecting waste in highrise buildings.
    I am a product designer,
    may i know what would you suggest to do to improve the recycling rate
    in highrise residential area?
    Like Hong Kong, now, there’s only one set of recycling bin per building, which is quite inconvenient for the residents to sort the waste everyday.
    Would you think having a low-cost recycling chute is a good idea?

    Reply
    • Thank you for the question. I haven’t a clue how to answer, so I’m hoping other readers will chime in here.

      Reply
    • Clint White.

      Positive air exhaust or suction on a floor by floor system? Maybe daily or weekly pickup by a janitor? A rinse station at the base to clean containers, creating a way to take waste on the way out of the building, drop it off, and pick your bucket up on the way back up?

      Reply
  • Clint White.

    Dropping a plastic bag of organics down the chute with your other trash and recyclables must make for a mess down below. I sure wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of that one! That poor chute has to be terribly smelly from pre-recycling use anyway. How about a Sim City styled ARCO? This has to be designed in to the building, along with a rooftop greenhouse that could compost up there and create sustainable gardens for the residents.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Enter Your Log In Credentials
×